"If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent" (essextee)
06/13/2016 at 20:10 • Filed to: None | 0 | 6 |
A new !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! article drops tomorrow! Keep an eye out around 10am EST.
S65
> If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
06/13/2016 at 20:12 | 0 |
Is it a lotus?
If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
> S65
06/13/2016 at 20:20 | 0 |
Nope
Bman76 (no it doesn't need a WS6 hood) M. Arch
> If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
06/13/2016 at 20:30 | 0 |
Very spooky new image (so spooky it greyed/deleted my comment)
If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
> Bman76 (no it doesn't need a WS6 hood) M. Arch
06/13/2016 at 20:34 | 0 |
I discovered that google’s reverse image search has suddenly gotten good enough to recognize cropped images.
As for the whole thing about your comment revealing what the car was mysteriously going missing, who knows. Kinja works in mysterious ways.
Bman76 (no it doesn't need a WS6 hood) M. Arch
> If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
06/13/2016 at 20:37 | 0 |
Oh, well it’s easily recognizable as a Jag B/C-pillar. I didn’t cheat.
JRapp: now as good as new again
> If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
06/13/2016 at 20:40 | 0 |
The shape of that buttocks looks like a cross between maybe an 8-series BMW and a Jag.